In todayâs dynamic business landscape, especially for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), access to working capital can be a game changer. While banks and NBFCs (Non-Bank Financial Companies) have long been the go-to sources of finance, emerging platforms like TReDS (Trade Receivables Discounting System) are redefining what it means to get timely, efficient, and cost-effective funding. Letâs explore why invoice discounting via TReDS is often a better option than traditional bank or NBFC loans.
Before comparing, it helps to understand what invoice discounting on TReDS means.
Here are several reasons why invoice discounting on TReDS often outperforms bank or NBFC loans for SMEs and growing businesses.
With bank loans or NBFC credit, there are multiple layers of paperwork: credit approvals, collateral checks, history of financials, and often long waiting periods. TReDS, however, works on actual invoices that are already validated with buyers. Since invoices are usually backed by established buyers or corporate entities, the financier has confidence in the cash flow. This reduces the time for verification, credit checks, and approvals. As a result, funds are released much sooner.
Banks and NBFCs often set interest rates high for SMEs because of perceived higher risk, lack of collateral, or weaker credit histories. In contrast, when invoices are discounted through TReDS, the risk is lower (since the invoice is from a creditworthy buyer). Also, due to competitive bidding among financiers on the TReDS platform, the discounting rate (which is analogous to the interest cost) can be significantly lower. This competitive environment helps bring down the cost of capital for the seller.
In many bank or NBFC loans, you have to provide collateral, guarantees, or personal security. Sometimes companies pledge fixed assets or real estate or even personal guarantees of promoters. With invoice discounting on TReDS, collateral is the invoice itself. As long as the debtor (buyer) is credible and accepts the invoice, the financier takes its risk mainly from payment performance rather than the borrowerâs physical assets or promoterâs net worth. This is a huge relief for SMEs who may not have strong collateral.
Because invoices in TReDS are tied to real buyers, often large corporates or well established firms, financiers look at buyer creditworthiness rather than the sellerâs. So if a business sells an invoice owed by a reputable buyer, the sellerâs risk is lower. Traditional loans, by contrast, tend to assess the risk of the borrower heavily, meaning weaker or smaller companies get penalized with high rates or tighter terms.
TReDS is regulated by RBI, with defined rules, oversight, and standard procedures. All participants (seller, buyer, financier) operate under a transparent schedule; there are standard contracts, set timelines for dispute resolution, and enforceable rights. Banks & NBFC loans, though regulated, sometimes have less standardized terms for invoicing, collateral, documentation, or disputes, which can lead to delays or hidden costs.
Invoice discounting lets businesses convert receivables to cash earlier, which improves liquidity. With healthier cash flow, firms can meet payroll, purchase raw materials, invest, and expand more sustainably. Loans, especially working capital loans, may have repayment obligations or interest burdens that reduce flexibility. Also, the pressures of fixed interest payments might hurt more when sales are cyclical. Invoice discounting aligns better with receivable cycles.
Using invoice discounting doesnât add new debt to the balance sheet in the same way as a loan might (depending on accounting norms), or at least it leverages existing receivables, not additional liabilities. This can make financial ratios look healthier and may avoid some of the over-leveraging that loans can produce. It also helps with maintaining better credit ratings, since outstanding invoices being discounted might be seen more favorably than variable high-interest loans.
As mentioned before, on TReDS, multiple financiers can bid to buy/discount a given invoice. This competitive auction-like environment means you may get more favorable discount rates, fewer fees, or better advance percentages (i.e. what the financier gives you upfront), compared to banks/NBFCs which may negotiate unilaterally.
Itâs fair to say that invoice discounting via TReDS isnât a panacea. There are cases where bank or NBFC loans might still make sense, or where they complement each other:
Comparison Table: TReDS Invoice Discounting vs Bank/NBFC Loans
Imagine a small manufacturing firm, âABC Componentsâ, supplying to large auto OEMs. They generate many invoices but are paid after 60 or 90 days. Traditionally, to maintain working capital, they may approach an NBFC for a loan, pledging assets or personal guarantees, paying high interest, and waiting weeks for funds. Meanwhile, their suppliers want payment earlier; wages need to be paid; opportunity for bulk raw-material discounts may be missed due to cash constraints.
Now, with TReDS:
The result: faster funds, lower cost than many NBFC or unsecured loans, minimal collateral, better cash flow.
TReDS is not just a theoretical construct; it is backed by regulatory frameworks that aim to protect all parties and build trust. The RBI supervises its operation, ensuring standards in documentation, dispute resolution, fair practices. This reduces uncertainty and risk, which are often baked into NBFC or bank loan costs for smaller firms.
Additionally, many large corporate buyers are now mandated or encouraged to allow invoices to be traded on TReDS, further increasing acceptability and liquidity.
While bank and NBFC loans have their established place especially for long-term investment, large purchases, or when a firm has strong collateral and credit history invoice discounting on TReDS offers a compelling alternative for working capital finance. For many SMEs, it translates into: